Selection chaos fuel India's woes
The events in Indian cricket that led into the New Year have left mecompletely disenchanted
Erapalli Prasanna
03-Jan-2003
The events in Indian cricket that led into the New Year have left me
completely disenchanted. Nothing seems to have changed over the years
except the dizzying remuneration offered to players. One cannot help
but think that the current players are being over-paid, especially
after watching their dismal performance in New Zealand.
While most of the top teams are improving in leaps and bounds, the
Indian team has taken the road in the opposite direction. As has been
the case with Pakistani cricket, there is no shortage of talent in
India, but harnessing the talent has never been a priority issue in
the subcontinent. The success of a Sachin Tendulkar or a Rahul Dravid
is clearly because of the effort that particular individual has put
into his game.
The results show brazenly, and no Indian cricket fan can be happy
about the way this Indian team has crumbled repeatedly in New Zealand.
With the World Cup just a month away, the team management and the
selectors have between them delivered a few shockers as New Year
gifts. Can anyone explain why Shiv Sunder Das was played in the first
ODI? Why was Rakesh Patel sent to New Zealand if he was not going to
play a game before December 31st?
With the exception of one selector, all four of the others have played
for India, and they will be the first to admit that they too have been
victims of the selectorial whims and fancies in their playing days.
Which is why it shocks me even more that these gentlemen are following
the same beaten track. In fact, to make life somewhat easier for
themselves, the selectors have been consulting the team management
about the choices, which makes it difficult for John Wright and Sourav
Ganguly to wash their hands of the responsibility for the selection
chaos.
© CricInfo |
It must have been some crazy logic indeed that led the selectors to
replace a batsman averaging around 40 with one who averages a shade
less than 17! My own view is that Laxman has been singled out as the
scapegoat for the collective failure of the Indian team in New
Zealand. I feel for Laxman, who has been pivotal in Ganguly becoming
one of the most successful Indian captains. Neither Ganguly nor Wright
would have been around now had it not been for India's startling
victory at Kolkata against Australia. But Laxman need not live on that
one big knock; he would have made it into the World Cup squad on sheer
merit, as the statistics reveal.
© CricInfo |
To give credit where it is due, I am glad that young Parthiv Patel has
been added to the Indian squad. The emphasis of the selections should
have been on youth, as the Australians have done. Having said that, I
must say that it is quite sad to see Steve Waugh not making it into
the World Cup squad. Few would cast any aspersions on his form,
ability or agility, and it is ironic that he would walk easily into
any other squad, purely on merit.
Now that the Indian squad has been named, I wish them all the best for
a successful World Cup in South Africa. One can only hope for the
best, but after watching yet another poor performance by the Indian
team at Christchurch, I wonder if there is anything left to hope for.