Ganguly is an imaginative captain who needs greater exposure
I regard Tiger Pataudi as the best captain I played under because of the methodical way in which he handled his bowlers and the skillful field placements he employed
Erapalli Prasanna
28-Jun-2001
I regard Tiger Pataudi as the best captain I played under because of
the methodical way in which he handled his bowlers and the skillful
field placements he employed. After all a captain can be judged only
when his team is in the field. Pataudi had the advantage of playing
against Karnataka, so he had a feel for the field which Chandra and
myself had and used the knowledge to good effect in the Tests. He was
a very good student of the game and a very confident person who also
inspired confidence in his teammates.
Pataudi utilised his resources very well. When he captained the Indian
team, he didn't have many pacemen around but he had three spinners to
operate, who were all attacking bowlers, and whom he rotated with
finesse. He was also very observant. I remember when we went to
England in 1967, I was not getting my usual loop in the nets. Pataudi
looked at me and knew I was a little concerned. He assured me it was
only because I was bowling with 2 or 3 sweaters, so my arm was not
coming round as it would do normally. He could also read what was
going on in the bowler's mind, foresee his intentions and adjust the
field before the bowler asked for a change. He had a lot of confidence
in me because I could bowl according to his instructions. Chandra and
Bedi were attacking bowlers, who were not able to contain the batsman
easily when the situation required, but I could bowl tight when he
wanted me to.
I played a lot of cricket under V Subramanyam who was my predecessor
as state captain, and we often discussed between us how to handle the
bowling resources of the side, so that helped me a lot when I took
over. It also helped that I was confident of my own ability. I always
believed that if Chandra had a bad day, I must do a little extra to
take the wickets that should have accrued to him.
It's often said that batsmen make better captains than bowlers and I
agree there is an element of truth in it. First of all cricket is a
batsman's game and secondly once his role as a batsman is over, he is
absolutely free to focus on his duties as a captain in the field. But
a bowler's thought process is often distracted by his primary role of
taking wickets because that is what he will finally be judged upon.
There are times when a bowling captain may underbowl or overbowl
himself or come into the attack when it is not really opportune, which
could give rise to criticism. But a batsman does not have these
constraints and can approach the job in a cool and collected manner.
I myself never felt disadvantaged because I knew my own capabilities
well and I was also familiar with all the other bowlers I played with.
I could assess whether it was Chandra's day or not and therefore set a
field accordingly. I had many memorable moments as captain. We won the
Ranji Trophy for the first time in 1973/74, and in the following year,
Karnataka completed a double by beating Rest of India in the Irani
Trophy. I also led the Rest of India successfully in the same
competition besides winning another Ranji Trophy campaign in 1977/78.
And while I didn't quite get to lead the country in my own right, I
was once asked to captain the team in New Zealand when Bedi and
Gavaskar couldn't take the field. During that short stopgap stint I
think I did what was expected of me creditably.
Now Sourav Ganguly isn't having a great time with the bat but I feel
his leadership skills are fairly well developed. Unfortunately
Ganguly's batting woes have hogged all the attention but it's only a
matter of time before he gets back into his stride. Being a part time
bowler also helps him to understand a bowler's psychology better,
especially the medium pacers. I think he's an attacking, imaginative
captain but he does need a little more exposure specially with respect
to attacking with the spinners. Perhaps a spot of interaction with
some former captains like Pataudi or even Gavasker would help. If he
can communicate his line of thinking to the bowlers more effectively
so that they realise what the captain is expecting of them, he would
emerge a better leader.